Philanthropic funds, through means of tax exemption, are most often those that would have otherwise been taxed and democratically allocated. Philanthropy is thus, in great part, anti-democratic in its decisions and processes.

Philanthropy often attempts to fill the gaps left by a broken democracy by trying to provide basic social needs, such as human services, education, and health care - all of which is an understandable response to such immediate crises. However, these often well-intentioned deeds unexpectedly justify the unfettered amassing of private wealth by placing praise on the individual donor, relieving pressure from governments to adequately address these fundamental rights and services. Moreover, total combined private charity in the U.S. accounts for less than 0.1% of federal budgets, and is a drop in the bucket relative to enormous and complex social needs. In this regard, philanthropy is often a highly inefficient and idiosyncratic form of tax money allocation.

We believe there is a unique and important role for philanthropy, focusing on two specific tasks. 


One, to improve the workings of government and democracy.

As government is slow and resistant to reforming itself, there is value for external energy that can provide pressure on these systems to change. As noted above, governments wield huge financial capacity, and philanthropy should seek to leverage its workings to be more efficient and equitable for all humans and ecologies, while not trying to take the place of government. This may include, for example, reforming the wasteful criminal justice system and reallocating funds for treatment and educational opportunities, ensuring fair and progressive taxation, facilitating honest dialogue around what most burdens our healthcare systems, true educational reforms, and funding avenues for fair elections and election reform.


Two, to fund projects that would never otherwise be funded by government.

Because democracy, by its nature, represents the common denominator of society, philanthropy can provide creative stimulus and inspiration by funding projects and ideas that lie entirely outside of the mainstream ethos, and are thus not yet viable for garnering public funds. These are areas often most stigmatized in society. Philanthropy is not burdened with the bureaucracy of government or democratic process, and thus has the freedom and flexibility to fund new paradigms that are outside of public discourse - emergent but suppressed or ignored. A primary focus of the Riverstyx Foundation, these kind of projects may include psychedelic research, support for indigenous peoples, composting bodies and human "waste", bringing greater acceptance to death and dying, and supporting the rights of those rejected by society - e.g prisoners, sex workers, and drug users. Philanthropy should stay vigilant and nimble, open to experimentation and risk-taking. As it experiences success by legitimizing certain arenas that can now garner public funding, it should pivot and look again to the horizon to see what opportunities are yet to be explored, at the edge.